Archive for the ‘Forestry’ Category

Small Mammal Study “Forestry isn’t rocket science…it’s way more complicated”

Friday, August 12th, 2011

Many have heard about the connection between spotted owls and forest management in the Pacific Northwest, but most have no idea of the scientific studies that take place in the forest before management decisions are made.

This spring and summer, a small mammal study took place in the forests of Northern California.   A research crew set out to study and document small mammal species occurrence and compare population estimates among various forest age classes.

Some of the small mammal species are recognized as prey for northern spotted owls.  The researchers compared population estimates among different forest age classes. They also documented the correlation between small mammal species population estimates and various forest stand features like riparian zones and leave patches in managed stands.

Small mammals were trapped from early May to the middle of August with a web-based trapping design. Each web consisted of 5 spokes and 7 rows, for a total of 35 trapping nodes. The nodes were spaced from each other, with each node containing one small and one medium-sized (i.e., woodrat sized) live trap.  Traps are baited with whole oats, sunflower seeds and raisins laced with peanut butter, the “icing on the cake”.  The traps are set under or beside ground cover such as logs or heavy foliage and those at risk of exposure to direct sunlight are shaded.

Cotton bedding is supplied to all traps.  Don’t want the little buggers getting cold at night. Traps are checked between sunrise and 11:00 and are locked open for the day after they are checked. 

When a small mammal is caught, several procedures take place. First they are identified by specie, their weights are taken, their feet are measured (presumably for shoe size).  

Their sex and reproductive age is determined and then they are tagged with a passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag. PIT tags are small capsules that contain microchips and are implanted under the skin on the hip of each animal as a marking method.  Each tag has a unique identification code, which is recognized by a portable reader.  Marked animals are released on site for potential recapture.

Studies like the Small Mammal Study are necessary for forest landowners to know how to make sound science-based management decisions.  Our goal is to provide good habitat for all the species that live in the forest while providing the quality wood products we all use on a daily basis.

The Real Dirt ~

Friday, July 1st, 2011

On June 13, 2011 the Washington based Enviromental Working Group listed the top 12 produce items that included residue from pesticides – California Women for Agriculture felt the need to respond to this article and so this is the letter we have come up with ~ Hopefully it provides some insight to the fruits and vegetables California Farmers produce~

I have the most precious niece in the world! She is a total farm girl and loves to help with ranch and farm chores. On occasion, she and I will pick our own strawberries in the field or cut up apples and sit on the porch to eat our “yummies.” Imagine my horror as I read with great sadness because of the misinformation presented as fact your report regarding the Environmental Working Group’s recent release of it’s updated “Dirty Dozen” list.

While I recognize that many people have concerns about possible pesticide residues on the food they eat, this report is clearly designed to make people feel that their food is unsafe and that pesticide residue on foods is a hazard that people should be highly cautious about. This is not based on any real scientific evidence. Scientists that have reviewed the list and the even the EWG themselves say is not risk based. Further, these scientists say that this “Dirty Dozen” list is actually misleading to consumers and should not be used when making purchasing decisions about fruits and vegetables.

I feel fortunate that a woman, auntie, and farmer that I have access to real information and am able to sort through the minutia of your article and EWG’s report to get to the heart of the matter and the truth. Unfortunately, too many folks won’t question it because it’s “in print” and will take the information at face value. And thus, a sector of the population will unnecessarily alter their eating habits and ultimately truly jeopardize their health.

EWG is neither a farm-based group nor agricultural advocates. In fact, EWG’s list is yet another example of why 79% of toxicologists surveyed say that the EWG is guilty of over-estimating risk to consumers. EWG develops its list through manipulation of the United States Department of Agriculture’s Pesticide Data Program results and the Federal Food and Drug Administration’s pesticide sampling data.

The EWG encourages its members to work for continued consumer access to ‘organic or low pesticide residue foods’. Current USDA and FDA sampling data clearly shows that this is what consumers are receiving now. The government sampling data results demonstrate that farmers aren’t just meeting the safety standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency, they are significantly exceeding those safety requirements. The crops sampled by USDA are shown to have either no residue at all or residues are 10 times to 100 times below the already stringent safety limits.

In addition to the hats I wear and previously identified, I am also the State President of California Women for Agriculture (CWA). CWA is the largest, all-volunteer, nonpartisan agricultural support organization in California; and our membership is primarily comprised of women who are farmers, consumers, working professionals, mothers and daughters – who share a passion to support California agriculture and advocate for the importance of ensuring a local, affordable and reliable food supply that results from a healthy and vibrant agricultural industry.

CWA, unlike EWG, promotes all of agricultural and rejects reports and claims such as those that EWG has made and seductively spews. I, personally, will continue to maintain a healthy lifestyle and diet of the “dozen” fruit and vegetables tagged by EWG as dangerous, as well as other fruits, vegetables, dairy and meat.

For consumers who may still be concerned about these very low levels of pesticide residues, they can follow the simple advice from the Federal Food and Drug Administration – just wash your fruits and vegetables. The FDA states that washing under running tap water can remove and often eliminate any minute pesticide residues that may be present. And, keep in mind, organic does not mean pesticide, herbicide or fertilizer free. Whether you choose organic or conventionally grown produce, washing is a healthful practice that should be followed prior to consuming fresh produce. Eating seasonally and buying local also helps to ensure that you are eating fresh and healthy produce.

What’s important to know is that food safety is something farmers take very, very seriously. After all, our families eat this food too and we often live on our farms and ranches. It is crucial that everyone in the supply chain from farmers to consumers be aware of and takes precautions to handle food properly, particularly when it comes to produce items that may be eaten raw.

Perhaps the most important advice from the government came recently with the release of the USDA’s long-awaited new food icon, MyPlate. To the applause of nutritionists and health officials, the government advises consumers to “fill half your plate with fruits and vegetables.” Further underscoring the importance of this recommendation are two new studies that have shown a correlation between inadequate consumption of fruits and vegetables and lower IQs and a higher incident of behavioral disorders in children.

Eating a balanced diet, coupled with exercise is so important to healthy eating. And, if you care where your produce comes from, then buy from California and USA farmers and ranchers and support organizations like CWA who value the truth and are intolerant of sensationalism.

(special thanks to the cwa and aaw members who created this letter- you are quite simply amazing)

Until next time ~

Celeste

Cool Careers in Agriculture

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

 

Future Ag Leaders!!

I have spent my entire life entrenched in the day to day operations of our family farm. For those of you who know me or who might have read my previous blogs you will know I love the deep heritage of my family and of what we do, providing a wholesome beef product for American consumers.

I feel so strongly about what we do that it has opened the door of talking to young people about why it is important to pursue careers in agriculture, why it is not only important it is necessary because no matter what anyone says agriculture is a viable industry, a great industry and one that is worthy of focus.

I really enjoy talking to young people and encouraging them to make their dreams become realities. Within the past year I have had the chance to talk young people involved in leadership positions and on college campuses and the one main message that I hit home with every time – is that Agriculture is ok , be proud to be a part of this industry, the industry needs YOU. No matter what path you decide to head down whether it is in production agriculture such as farming or ranching, education, banking, marketing, media, retail, wholesale, foodservice, organic, grassfed production, hormone free production, or good ole conventional – there is a place for you at the agriculture dinner table. The beauty of agriculture is there are so many choices- its really up to you!!

Agriculture is a great career choice – the opportunities are endless, if you don’t think so then talk to a farmer. It is the hardest most rewarding career you will ever find!

Sierra Cascade Logging Conference In-Woods Education Day 2011

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

Each year, the Sierra Cascade Logging Conference (SCLC) conducts an “In-woods Education Day for students as part of its education outreach.  The forest management demonstration covers forestry related topics designed to showcase a variety of job possibilities in the industry.  The stations, structured into 8 different categories, each demonstrate a component of forest management varying from wildlife to water quality monitoring to actual harvest methods. Students are guided by foresters and other industry experts through the stations, each lasting approximately 15 minutes.

This year, two groups of students totaling more than 550 participated.  The younger kids were 5th grade students and the older group, high school age.  12 different schools were represented and some came from as far away as Hayfork and Dunsmuir, almost 100 miles one-way.

A Wildlife Biologist  talks about wildlife studies for forestry operations

 

 

California Department of Fish and Game fish station – electroshock

 

Chipping/biomass processing

 

Hotsaw mechanical harvesting

 

Timber falling

 

Water quality monitoring

 

Log landing operation – processing and loading

 

Group Photo Station

 

 

The majority of the event expense, busing the students to and from the event, is paid for with SCLC education funds.  Blue Ridge Forest Management and Creekside Logging give up several days of production just to stage the event and to clear walking trails to make it safe for all.  A suitable area that busses can easily access and mild terrain for hiking are factors considered when picking a location. Once the event is over, we start looking for potential locations for the upcoming year. 

The event culminates with small group photos, staged in front of large pieces of logging equipment.  What a fun day for all…and most kids say, “It was the coolest field trip ever!”

About the Sierra Cascade Logging Conference

 

We are the largest Forest Products Equipment Exposition in the West.

We hold an annual conference to enable manufacturers and dealers to display and demonstrate equipment, tools and supplies relating to forest management and construction, including conservation groups, recreational groups and other industries of common interest.

We sponsor social events for the conference and provide an opportunity for the exchange of ideas among members in the fields of forest management and associated fields.

We promote the art, practice and standards of good logging and good forestry.

We represent, advance and protect the interests and standards of the business and professions of logging and forestry, and provide a medium of contact between the forest products industry, public forest agencies and other interests of common interest.

We encourage and aid the training and proficiency of young people interested in logging, forestry and related fields.

We promote acquaintance, cooperative effort and good relations between our members and others engaged in forest management and related industries in other areas.

We promote a better understanding of the Forest Products Industry by the public.

Forest Thinning Would Yield Additional Water

Tuesday, May 10th, 2011

Managed – Open Forest Stand

As the state looks for ways to meet ever-increasing water demands for a growing population and environmental needs, a representative from the California Forestry Association says the state should consider how much water is being transpired through the overly dense national forests of the Sierra Nevada.

California could have plentiful, quality water in the form of groundwater recharge and runoff if its public forests were well managed and restored to a healthy condition, said Steve Brink, vice president of public resources for the trade association, whose members include forest landowners and businesses that make forest products.

Brink made his remarks during the California Farm Bureau Federation 2011 Leaders Conference.

He said with properly managed forests and active forest thinning, not only will the state significantly reduce wildfires by 22 percent to 60 percent and have healthy watersheds that minimize sediment production, but it could also get back 1 million to 3 million acre-feet or more of additional water annually.

“So how much water is that? It’s the storage capacity of Lake Oroville,” he said, noting that the reservoir contains more than 3.3 million acre-feet of water. “You could almost fill up the equivalent of Lake Oroville if our national forests were managed.”

More than half of California’s water originates in the watersheds of its national forests, much of it in the Sierra Nevada. But lack of forest management and too much vegetation has contributed to reduced water flows in the state’s watersheds, particularly during dry years, he said.

“When we have a really dry year, it can be so dry that the water stress will be such that vegetation actually dies,” he said. “We had a couple of years here (in 2004 and 2007) where manzanita has died from water stress, and I thought manzanita was indestructible.”

He pointed out that in the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, which is in Yosemite National Park and is a major water source for the San Francisco Bay Area, there has been an average of a 30 percent reduction in spring snowpack since the 1970s due to vegetation growth.

“And that means less groundwater recharge and runoff in the spring and summer months,” he said.

The Department of Water Resources estimates that some 53 to 54 inches of water are evaporated and transpired in the Sierra Nevada annually. The ratio of evaporation to transpiration is small when there is significant canopy cover on the soil, according to DWR.

A few forest studies, including one done in the Feather River watershed in May 2007, show that an increase of 20 percent to 30 percent in water yield can be expected from forest thinning, but such increases are “not sustained due to (forest) re-growth unless you keep after it,” he said.

There are 9.8 million acres of productive forestland within California’s national forests that’s not reserved, or that is not in the wilderness. That averages to about 93 bone-dry tons of biomass per acre, Brink noted.

Regional foresters would like to perform 500,000 acres of mechanical thinning and understory removal per year rather than the current 100,000 acres per year, he said. A typical thinning would remove 10 bone-dry tons of commercial trees and 13 bone-dry tons of surface and ladder fuels per acre. The growth rate after the thinnings is about 0.6 bone-dry tons biomass per acre per year, he added.

“Remember, the forest grows. And particularly after thinning, you spur growth,” he said.

He calculates that with active forest thinning, the state could potentially yield 3.3 million acre-feet of water per year, about the amount of water stored in Lake Oroville.

There are other benefits to healthy national forests, he said, including a reduction in sediment rates and fewer wildfires. Costs to suppress those wildfires would also be significant, he added. In addition, thousands of new jobs in rural California counties could be created in actively managing the state’s national forests, he said.

(By: Ching Lee, assistant editor of Ag Alert. She may be contacted at clee@cfbf.com.)

This article was reprinted courtesy of the California Farm Bureau Federation

Sustainablewood is currently the President of the Sierra Cascade Logging Conference and second Vice President of the Shasta County Farm Bureau Board.